In late antiquity, the religion split the Mediterranean world in two. Now it is remaking the Continent.
Europe was essentially defined by Islam. And Islam is redefining it now.
For centuries in early and middle antiquity, Europe meant the world surrounding the Mediterranean, or Mare Nostrum (“Our Sea”), as the Romans famously called it. It included North Africa. Indeed, early in the fifth century A.D., when Saint Augustine lived in what is today Algeria, North Africa was as much a center of Christianity as Italy or Greece. But the swift advance of Islam across North Africa in the seventh and eighth centuries virtually extinguished Christianity there, thus severing the Mediterranean region into two civilizational halves, with the “Middle Sea” a hard border between them rather than a unifying force. Since then, as the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset observed, “all European history has been a great emigration toward the North.”
After the breakup of the Roman empire, that northward migration saw the Germanic peoples (the Goths, Vandals, Franks, and Lombards) forge the rudiments of Western civilization, with the classical legacy of Greece and Rome to be rediscovered only much later. It would take many more centuries for the modern European state system to develop. Slowly, though, feudalism, whose consensual give-and-take worked in the direction of individualism and away from absolutism, gave way to early modern empires and, over time, to nationalism and democracy. Along the way, new freedoms allowed the Enlightenment to take hold. In sum, “the West” emerged in northern Europe (albeit in a very slow and tortuous manner) mainly after Islam had divided the Mediterranean world.
Islam did much more than geographically define Europe, however. Denys Hay, a British historian, explained in a brilliant though obscure book published in 1957, Europe: The Emergence of an Idea, that European unity began with the concept (exemplified by the Song of Roland) of a Christendom in “inevitable opposition” to Islam—a concept that culminated in the Crusades. The scholar Edward Said took this point further, writing in his book Orientalism in 1978 that Islam had defined Europe culturally, by showing Europe what it was against. Europe’s very identity, in other words, was built in significant measure on a sense of superiority to the Muslim Arab world on its periphery. Imperialism proved the ultimate expression of this evolution: Early modern Europe, starting with Napoleon, conquered the Middle East, then dispatched scholars and diplomats to study Islamic civilization, classifying it as something beautiful, fascinating, and—most crucial—inferior.
In the postcolonial era, Europe’s sense of cultural preeminence was buttressed by the new police states of North Africa and the Levant. With these dictatorships holding their peoples prisoner inside secure borders—borders artificially drawn by European colonial agents—Europeans could lecture Arabs about human rights without worrying about the possibility of messy democratic experiments that could lead to significant migration. Precisely because the Arabs lacked human rights, the Europeans felt at once superior to and secure from them.
Islam is now helping to undo what it once helped to create. A classical geography is organically reasserting itself, as the forces of terrorism and human migration reunite the Mediterranean Basin, including North Africa and the Levant, with Europe. The Continent has absorbed other groups before, of course. In fact, Europe has been dramatically affected by demographic eruptions from the east: In the medieval centuries, vast numbers of Slavs and Magyars migrated into central and eastern Europe from deeper inside Eurasia. But those peoples adopted Christianity and later formed polities, from Poland in the north to Bulgaria in the south, that were able to fit, however bloodily, inside the evolving European state system. As for the Algerian guest workers who emigrated to France and the Turkish and Kurdish guest workers who emigrated to Germany during the Cold War, they represented a more containable forerunner to the current migration.
Today, hundreds of thousands of Muslims who have no desire to be Christian are filtering into economically stagnant European states, threatening to undermine the fragile social peace. Though Europe’s elites have for decades used idealistic rhetoric to deny the forces of religion and ethnicity, those were the very forces that provided European states with their own internal cohesion.
Meanwhile, the new migration, driven by war and state collapse, is erasing the distinction between the imperial centers and their former colonies. Orientalism, through which one culture appropriated and dominated another, is slowly evaporating in a world of cosmopolitan interactions and comparative studies, as Said intuited it might. Europe has responded by artificially reconstructing national-cultural identities on the extreme right and left, to counter the threat from the civilization it once dominated.
Although the idea of an end to history—with all its ethnic and territorial disputes—turns out to have been a fantasy, this realization is no excuse for a retreat into nationalism. The cultural purity that Europe craves in the face of the Muslim-refugee influx is simply impossible in a world of increasing human interactions.
“The West,” if it does have a meaning beyond geography, manifests a spirit of ever more inclusive liberalism. Just as in the 19th century there was no going back to feudalism, there is no going back now to nationalism, not without courting disaster. As the great Russian intellectual Alexander Herzen observed, “History does not turn back … All reinstatements, all restorations have always been masquerades.”
The question is thus posed: What, in a civilizational sense, will replace Rome? For while empire, as Said documented, certainly had its evils, its very ability to govern vast multiethnic spaces around the Mediterranean provided a solution of sorts that no longer exists.
Europe must now find some other way to dynamically incorporate the world of Islam without diluting its devotion to the rule-of-law-based system that arose in Europe’s north, a system in which individual rights and agency are uppermost in a hierarchy of needs. If it cannot evolve in the direction of universal values, there will be only the dementia of ideologies and coarse nationalisms to fill the void. This would signal the end of “the West” in Europe.
So there you have it.
To answer the other questions, and this is due to the construct of "Europe" and "European".
1. A shared European identity does not exist (outside of social constructs). Europe doesn't even exist, it's the Western part of Asia? Why is it its own continent? Because that division is political. Europe ends where people become Muslim.
2. Because of point 1, yes, being Muslim negates that (socially constructed) identity.
3. The idea of Europe was defined by Christianity, so yes. Again, related to point 1.
The construct of "European" is really a precursor of what became "white" in the colonies... although historically, "white" was more specific (only meant Anglo-Saxons), it wasn't until the late 20th century that "white" became synonymous with "European". And now I find "European" is becoming a politically correct euphemism for "white" because "whiteness" is becoming less and less socially acceptable (as it should be, since it is a racist concept at its core).
Must be noted, I am not bashing cultures from or descended from that geographic area. Right-wingers would get triggered by this post. People have their cultures. People are French, Dutch, English, Irish, etc etc etc., all with rich cultures and histories, they are not "European" or "white".
My questions are: -Does a shared European identity exist? -If so, does being Muslim negate said identity? -Is Christianity the only acceptable religion for Europeans, despite being of Middle Eastern origin as well?
I don't believe in a Pan-European identity no, and especially not Pan-European nationalism (the alt-right talks about Pan-European nationalism a lot). Pan-European nationalists think a Europe and North America with only people of European descent and without any non-European influences (whatever that is) would be paradise on earth. Well just reading history we know that Europeans have had shitloads of conflicts with each other and that European ethnicities have discriminated other European ethnicities. So no, Pan-European identity and nationalism feels artificial to me.
I do think some view European Muslims as 'lesser Europeans' and perhaps less "white" especially in these days when being a Muslim is highly stigmatized. We had a discussion in another thread how Turks are seen as brown and swarthy byt lots of Westerners because of their Muslim faith while Christian Middle Easterners and West Asians are often described as "whiter" and less of a threat because people believe they can integrate more easily by being non-Muslims. In reality Turks are probably lighter and more Euro looking than Christian Middle Easterners.
Souriquois: We are on discord
Jan 23, 2022 21:14:48 GMT -4
soul49: I can definitely see this forum is dead. Do people still chat in other areas? I've been very busy over the past year with university work and other stuff, but would be cool to catch up with folks on occasion. Just know I'm still alive lol.
Jan 7, 2022 21:50:12 GMT -4
soul49: Happy belated New Year
Jan 7, 2022 21:48:50 GMT -4
catman: almost xmas guys and gals
Dec 10, 2021 12:45:22 GMT -4
Souriquois: didn't help that we had an election
Oct 5, 2021 13:43:40 GMT -4
Souriquois: No getting bad again, even with 80% of people vaccinated
Oct 5, 2021 13:43:16 GMT -4
soul49: Hows Covid up there in Canada? Things looking slightly better?
Sept 30, 2021 0:51:00 GMT -4